Forgetting Hashem

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch 

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

      * * * * *

ABOMINATIONS IN YERUSHALAYIM

      Guard yourself lest you forget the Almighty… (Devorim 8:11).

      The entire world trembles as every passing day brings Iran closer to nuclear capability. However, Torah-true Jews do not have the slightest fears regarding Iran. We know that without Hashem's consent, they cannot lift a finger against us.

      What are we worried about? The posuk warns us that what we must fear the most is the possibility that we may forget the Almighty. If this happens, then we really have something to fear.

      The Smag writes that forgetting Hashem is a Torah prohibition. How do we make sure we avoid this transgression? If Divine honor is being trampled on, we must take action to protect it. Otherwise, we have forgotten the Almighty.

      The posuk in Parshas Ha'azinu writes that to'eivos, abominations, yach'isuhu, arouse the anger of the Almighty. Rashi explains that this refers to the abominations of same-gender marriages. There is no other transgression that Hashem considers as much of an affront to His honor, and it therefore elicits such a harsh Divine response.

      On the 18^th of Av, in the holy city of Yerushalayim, there was a parade of those who are guilty of this very abominable act. We can only imagine the level of Divine anger that was stirred up by this event. What can Jews in Israel and around the world do to counter the spiritual damage that took place and to save our entire nation from the great catastrophe that this could cause?

THE DANGER OF KEEPING QUIET

      There are pesukim in Yechezkel that warn of the great retribution that will come about if there are such abominations in Yerushalayim: the entire population would be killed. At the time of these warnings, the Jewish people did not listen, and eventually Divine patience ran out and a decree was handed down for all of the transgressors to be killed.

      The Gemara in Maseches Shabbos (55a) states that this instance was the only time in the history of Klal Yisroel that Hashem rescinded a positive decree. These abominations that took place during the times of Yechezkel were similar to the acts of those who marched in Yerushalayim on the 18^th of Av.

      At that time, Hashem made a gezeirah to destroy all of the resha'im, but to put a tuf on the heads of the tzaddikim. The Soton went to Hashem and pointed out that the tzaddikim didn't protest all of these abominations. Hashem replied that even if they had said something, it would not have helped. The Soton continued his accusation and said that although this may be true, the tzaddikim did not know that, so they should have taken action.

      Hashem did not argue with this claim of the Soton, and responded by rescinding His decree to protect the tzaddikim from being killed along with the resha'im in this gezeirah of destruction. In no other case in history did Hashem rescind a positive decree. History tends to repeat itself, and if we keep quiet, we may find ourselves in a similar situation.

AN OBLIGATION TO PROTEST

      At Har Sinai, the malachim told Hashem not to give us the Torah, for we were destined to violate it. While their prediction was accurate, Klal Yisroel replied to the malachim that they acceptedarvus, i.e., responsibility for the sins of all future Jews, and it was under these conditions that Hashem agreed to give us the Torah. Since we have accepted responsibility, even though we are not actively marching in this parade, we are responsible for the actions of those who are.

      Tosafos in Maseches Shavous writes that if a talmid chochom is quiet and does not give evidence that he knows, it is as if he did the act himself. So, too, if we sit by quietly while an abomination happens, we will be held accountable for it as if we had done it ourselves. We must do what we can to stop future events.

      Other Torah luminaries agreed with the importance of protesting this abominable display. When Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv was asked whether Jews should attend the protest, he replied, "The Torah says that when abominations take place, one must make a protest. What can I add to the words of the Torah?”

FIGHTING AMALEIK

      The war against Amaleik continues in every generation. Amaleik completely denied the existence of Hashem and laughed at Him. They took the milah of Jews and threw them to the Heavens, implying that that is where this mitzvah belongs.

      Rav Chaim Brisker said that the Rambam writes that the mitzvah of destroying Amaleik is to destroy the zeicher of Amaleik, not just the seed of Amaleik. Anything that has to do with Amaleik is included in this prohibition. The animals who are parading today are not only zeicher Almaleik. They are Amaleik.

      Chazal tell us that Amaleik comes when Klal Yisroel is weak in Torah learning. Targum Yonason says that this is what Eisav had in mind when he said that he would kill Yaakov when Yitzchok died. It was because Yaakov would not be learning Torah then. Even if Yaakov would be learning, he could not be learning b'iyun. Under such circumstances, he was vulnerable.

      The Torah states that if we allow abominations, the Shechinah will leave us. Women also have to strengthen themselves to prevent the strengthening of Amaleik. Inappropriate clothing fuels the power of Amaleik. Every Jew has to look into his or her own life and try to eliminate what they are doing that might have had a part in bringing this abominable parade to Yerushalayim.

PROFANING YERUSHALAYIM

      During the time of the Vilna Gaon, there lived a famous righteous convert whose name was Avrohom ben Avrohom. He was from a distinguished family of religious non-Jews, and they were appalled by his decision to convert to Judaism. For his betrayal to the faith, he was sentenced to be burned alive.

      Right before the ger tzedek was about to be killed, the goyim said that if he would make the smallest sign of agreement with the religion of the notzrim, they would release him. The ger tzedekreplied that he was not willing to engage in even the smallest act of agreement, and Avrohom ben Avrohom died a death of complete kiddush Hashem. The Vilna Gaon commented that, at that moment, the power of the Soton was weakened.

      On the other hand, when great chillul Hashem takes place, the power of the Soton is strengthened. This is what happened on the 18^th of Av when this abominable parade took place in the holy city. The Yerushalayim of 4 p.m. on the 18^th of Av was not the same Yerushalayim as that of 8 p.m., after it was profaned by the parade.

      In our days, we are suffering through a bitter golus, and the pain of the Shechinah is great. Some rabbonim said that we should not protest the parade because it will cause people to speak about things that are an abomination. While this sounds logical, remaining silent actually makes these issues even worse.

      From the story of the ger tzedek, we see that the mere presence of these people here in the holy city strengthens the forces of impurity in Yerushalayim. The entire city is threatened by this. If we sit back silently, these forces will quietly grow stronger and stronger.

BIRTHPAINS OF MOSHIACH

      Rav Yochanan, who experienced the death of ten of his children, said he could not withstand the pain of chevlei Moshiach. These words are extremely difficult to understand. What could be worse than having ten children die?

      Rav Elya Lopian, in the name of Rav Simcha Zissel, explains that Rav Yochanan was afraid that he would not be able to stand the nisyonos of the End of Days.

      Having such an abominable parade marching through the streets of Yerushalayim is surely included in the events that Rav Yochanan feared.

      On the 18^th of Av, the Creator of the Universe was disgraced in His holy palace. By protesting, we show that we also share in His pain. Whatever we can do, we are responsible to do.

      One tumah brings another tumah. If we sit by silently and let this happen, then it will get worse and worse. We must do what we can to stop these types of events.

      This year's parade was much larger than last year's parade. Next year, they are planning an even bigger parade. They want to bring people from all over the world to flaunt their abominations.

      The Torah warns us about forgetting Hashem, and, as mentioned above, one of the greatest expressions of ignoring Hashem is standing by quietly while Divine honor is trampled upon. Every Jew, both inside and outside of Israel, should try and feel the great pain that the Shechinah suffered from this abomination that took place in Yerushlayim, and try and do teshuvah for the transgression that may have helped bring it about. In this way, we will merit to see the great revelation of Divine honor soon.

      * * * * *

      Rabbi Travis is a rosh kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim, and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy - A Daily Tefilla Companion," a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Shternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parsha, compiled and edited by Rabbi Travis, are now available as a sefer titled “A Voice in the Darkness.” For more information about his work, contact dytravis@actcom.com. 

TEASER 

If we sit back silently, these forces will quietly grow stronger and stronger.

Tefilos515

The Unanswered Tefilos of Moshe Rabbeinu  

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch 

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

      • • • • • 

 

No Admission

“And [Moshe Rabbeinu] beseeched Hashem…” (Devarim 3:23) 

Hashem decreed that Moshe Rabbeinu could not enter into Eretz Yisrael. Although Moshe was the eved Hashem par excellence, he did not accept the decree without a struggle. Moshe Rabbeinu offered 515 tefilos in attempt to overturn the verdict, but despite all of his  efforts, the decree remained intact. 

      This whole episode is extremely difficult to understand. Seemingly, such sincere prayer should have produced the desired results, so why was this particular request met with such a strong negative reaction? 

      Even more astounding is that the Almighty Himself tells Moshe Rabbeinu at a certain point not to say even one more tefilah, for after number 516, He would have had to let him in. If just one more prayer would have caused Hashem to change His verdict, there must have been a fairly strong argument to  allow Moshe access to the Promised Land, so why was Hashem so adamant not to grant him this? 

And yet another question arises: After telling Moshe that he cannot come into Eretz Yisrael, the pasuk concludes with the word “laimor.” Chazal tell us  the presence of laimor indicates that this passage is something that should be written in the Torah. Why was it so important that this command be recorded?  

Let us try to understand the deeper message of this difficult parsha. 

Living Outside of Israel 

“Hashem was enraged against me for your sake…” (Devarim 3:26) 

On a number of occasions, Moshe Rabbeinu had protested Hashem's harsh punishment of the Jewish people. At times, the Almighty had acquiesced, and at times not, but we do not find a case besides this one where He was angered by such behavior. What caused Him to get so upset on this occasion? 

At this auspicious moment, when the entire Jewish nation were entering the land of Israel, Hashem wished to set a precedent for all future generations. Lest people claim that the Torah can only be kept in Israel, the life of Moshe Rabbeinu would show otherwise. Moshe was the holiest Jew who ever lived, and he never set foot into the land. 

For this very reason, Moshe Rabbeinu was buried in front of Ba'al Peor. The Medrash explains that the idol of Ba'al Peor represented the philosophy that a person should blend into his surroundings. They suggested that if a Jew finds himself in a more lenient society, he should drop all previously adhered-to convictions.  

Moshe Rabbeinu's burial comes to dispel this erroneous way of thinking. Torah is above time and place, and no matter where a Jew finds himself, In Israel or in a barren desert, a Jew continues to live his life according to the elevated standards that Hashem set for us. 

The irreligious Zionists claimed that the most important mitzvah is living in Israel. Jews could remain being mechalel Shabbos and eating pork, as long as they helped build Israel through their labor or contributions. By keeping Moshe Rabbeinu outside of Israel, Hashem intended to show us all that Eretz Yisrael is a means and not an end, thus dispelling this erroneous philosophy, which laid the groundwork for the shemad of millions of Jews. 

Don't Stop Davening

Chazal tell us that if a person davens and is not answered, he should not give up – that even if a person does not see results from his prayers, he should still continue. No matter what transpires, a person should remain persistent.  

      The Almighty told Moshe Rabbeinu that if he offers one more prayer, He will have to give him what he is asking for. Through Moshe's 515 tefilos, Hashem was subtly showing us that even after that many prayers, a person should not give up. At times a person may just need 516 tefilos to be granted his request. 

      A second lesson that we can extract from Moshe Rabbeinu's prayers is that tefilah should be said b'tachanunuim, from the depths of one's soul. Requests made merely to discharge one's obligation are not considered to be tefilah. Crying out to Hashem with all of one's heart is what brings results. 

Torah Leadership

We have offered some answers to the question of why Hashem did not want Moshe Rabbeinu to come into Eretz Yisrael, but another question remains: Why did Moshe Rabbeinu want to come into the land so badly in any case? 

Chazal tell us that Moshe Rabbeinu's intentions were to fulfill the mitzvos of Eretz Yisrael. Although this is certainly a worthwhile reason, it is difficult to understand how this would justify putting up such a fight against the Divine decree – especially since in all other cases, Moshe Rabbeinu showed complete and consistent subservience to the Almighty's will. 

Am Yisrael is an am kasheh-oref, a stiff-necked people. This attribute manifests itself in two ways: While the Jewish people tend to remain very stubborn before accepting something that is not proven truth, at times they will show the same attribute by refusing to accept Hashem's decrees. 

Moshe Rabbeinu knew how difficult it was to lead the Jewish people. Getting them to accept upon themselves many new mitzvos would not be an easy task, and he felt that he was best suited for the job. 

For this reason, Aharon did not dispute the ruling of the Almighty that his younger brother should be appointed the position; he understood that he was not as capable as Moshe to lead Klal Yisrael, so he accepted the Divine decree with love. 

While Moshe Rabbeinu had great leadership qualities, Hashem did not think that this outweighed the other reasons for refusing him entry into Eretz Yisrael. Instead, the Almighty instructed Moshe to strengthen Yeshua, to teach him and give him all he could; this way, Moshe Rabbeinu's talents would be infused into his faithful talmid, enabling him to perform his challenging task properly. 

We might long for the Gedolim of previous generations, saying to ourselves, “If only this Gadol were still alive, life would be different.” In truth, however, Hashem gives every period in Jewish history Torah leadership according to the needs of that time. We must be thankful for the Gedolim of our generation and be happy that the Almighty continues to bestow us with Torah leaders who understand the needs of their respective generations.  

(Rabbi Travis is Rosh Kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy – A Daily Tefilla Companion" a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Sternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parasha are now available as a sefer entitled "A Voice in the Darkness". For more information about his work contact dytravis@actcom.com.)  

 

Jurisprudence

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch 

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

      * * * * *

PRIORITIZING

      “Do not show favor in judgment, listen carefully to small and large cases, do not be afraid of anyone, for mishpot is in the jurisdiction of Elokim…”

      Sefer Devorim starts off by describing the type of judicial system that we should establish. After listing a number of requirements, the Torah substantiates its requirements by writing that mishpot is in the jurisdiction of Elokim. What is the deeper meaning of this idea?

      Moshe Rabbeinu is instructed to set up these courts, and to find judges who can decide cases between one Jew and another. On the surface, it might appear as though this mitzvah pales in comparison to Shabbos, kashrus, and other such Torah commandments that govern man's direct relationship with his Creator. These are the areas that would seem to deserve much more focus and attention.

      For this reason, the Torah states the direct association between mishpot and Elokim. In connecting judicial law to His Divine name, the Torah is saying that someone who downplays the mitzvosinvolving interpersonal relationships should recognize that his actions are an affront to Elokim. This is why the neviim repeatedly warned the Jewish people to make sure that they were not lax regarding this category of mitzvos. 

UNPAID DEBTS

      There is also a more hidden aspect to this association: On occasion, a person might come to bais din thinking that he has an open and shut case, one hundred percent sure that he will be victorious. Yet, when the p'sak is issued, it is actually his opponent who is rendered the victor. How can he come to terms with what seems to be a clear perversion of justice?

      The Zohar explains that this is the deeper connection between mishpot and Elokim. At times, there are debts that need to be repaid from other gilgulim, i.e., previous occasions that we lived in this world. Through some minor financial losses in this world, Elokim makes sure that a person can go into the next world free of previous debts.

      Every Jew who experiences seemingly undeserved suffering in this world should keep the above concept in mind. Nothing in this world is for naught. Any travails that a person experiences during his lifetimes lessen the necessity for punishment in the next world.

      Rav Sternbuch remembers seeing Rav Mordechai Pogramansky during the last days of his life. Although Rav Pogramansky was stricken with stomach cancer, was already blind, and suffered from unbearable pain, he did not complain at all. On the contrary, he pleaded with Hashem that He should allow him to pay off all of his debts in this world and come to the next world clean.

      Rav Pogramansky's actions are certainly an extremely high level and far beyond the reach of most Jews in this generation. Yet, there is an important message in his words, even for us today. All of Hashem's actions are just, and if we can swallow what He sends us, we will definitely be remunerated with acceptance in the next world.  

IN THE SHADOWS OF CHURBAN HABAYIS

      Perhaps the greatest punishment that the Jewish people have received as a nation was the destruction of both the first and second Botei Mikdosh. On Tisha B'Av, we spend the entire day recognizing this tragedy. Yet, our mourning goes far beyond that: Tisha B'Av is also the day to remember all of the many tragedies that Klal Yisroel has experienced throughout history.

      The Medrash describes Tisha B'Av as a day of mourning and as a mo'ed, a festival. We can understand why Tisha B'Av is viewed as a sad day, given all of the travails we suffered on that day, but what about Tisha B'Av classifies it as a festival?

      When the Bais Hamikdosh stood, Divine judgment was much stronger. Since we were able to witness constant miracles there, any doubt in emunah was considered a major breach in our relationship with Hashem. Transgressions during this time quite seriously aroused His anger, and the attribute of din was very prominent.

      After the destruction of the Bais Hamikdosh, the full extent of the Shechinah's Presence is no longer felt. Because of this, Divine retribution is much less harsh. While His face is hidden, Hashem expects much less of us.

      For this very reason, Tisha B'Av is also considered to be a festival. In today's world, where the Shechinah is almost completely veiled, any mitzvah we perform is considered a major accomplishment. Even the smallest act is looked upon as something extraordinary.

      On the other hand, because there is so much impurity in the world, our transgressions are viewed as less serious. What once required many fasts and other forms of abstention to gain atonement can now be achieved with relative ease. The same destruction that is a reason to mourn can simultaneously be viewed in a different and more positive light.

      As we approach the coming of Moshiach, we can strengthen ourselves by keeping the dual nature of this time in mind. We should never let the craziness of the world around us pull us into the abyss of modern day society. Our lowly state should not be a cause for depression. Rather, we should use it to lift ourselves up and empower ourselves to strive forward during this final chapter of Jewish history. 

      * * * * *

      Rabbi Travis is a rosh kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim, and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy - A Daily Tefilla Companion," a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Shternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parsha, compiled and edited by Rabbi Travis, are now available as a sefer titled “A Voice in the Darkness.” For more information about his work, contact dytravis@actcom.com. 

TEASER 

The same destruction that is a reason to mourn can simultaneously be viewed in a different and more positive light. 

 

Deep Secrets

The Hidden Meaning of Klal Yisroel's Journey's Through the Dessert

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch 

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

* * * * *

MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE

      “These are the journeys of the Jewish people…” (Bamidbar 33:1).

      At first glance, Parshas Masei appears to be one of the most uneventful parshiyos of the whole Torah. Why does the Torah have to tell us about all of the journeys that the Jewish people made during their time in the midbar? Furthermore, what is the point of giving names to all of the places where they rested?

      The Raavad (Adiyos 2:9) explains that when Moshiach comes, the Jewish people will not be taken straight into Eretz Yisroel. As the novi Yechezkel writes, “I will take them through the desert of the nations.” Rashi on that posuk says that this refers to Klal Yisroel's travels through the desert when they left Mitzrayim. What is the deeper connection between these journeys and the time of Moshiach?

      From Rashi we see that all of the difficulties that the Jewish people endured during their travels in the desert left a lasting effect on the world, which will only be fully recognized when Moshiach comes.As a result of all of our traveling in the desert, Klal Yisroel gained the ability to survive the long journey through the golus, which is comparable to a midbar. These journeys gave us the tools that we need to be successful in all of the difficult nisyonos that we face during these trying times.

      All of the tribulations that we encounter today are, in fact, hinted to in the 42 journeys that the Jewish people made whilst in the desert. These 42 maasa'os also parallel the 42 letters of one of Hashem's names. Is there a connection between these two remazim?

      Everything that takes place in the world is Divinely orchestrated. This is what is hinted to by the number of journeys, which is equal to the numerical value of a Divine name. When Moshiach comes, the gates of wisdom will be opened up and we will merit to understand how every single tribulation that Klal Yisroel endured during our time in golus was with great Divine precision, and each one stemmed directly from Hashem. 

TAKING A BREAK

      Parshas Masei lists each of the journeys of the Jewish people during their forty-year sojourn in the desert. Why, then, does the Torah also list the places where they rested? Seemingly, this has nothing to do with their travels...

      During these forty years, the Jews were on their way to Eretz Yisroel. Since they were traveling for the sake of a mitzvah, the Torah considers them to be actively journeying even while they were taking a break. Resting in order to have the strength to complete a mitzvah is also called doing a mitzvah.

      Internalizing the message of this parsha will help us view life differently. All of one's time in this world is a journey to the next. In this light, everything that one does while here is preparation for his true dwelling in Olam Haba.

      This is what Chazal meant when they said that talmidei chachomim do not have rest in this world. Every moment of their lives is channeled to reaching higher and higher levels of spiritual perfection. They are constantly on the move to their true destination in the World to Come.

      A wealthy Jew once visited the Chofetz Chaim and was shocked to see the austere quarters that he resided in. When he asked the Chofetz Chaim where all of his furniture is, the Chofetz Chaim surprised him by posing the same question to him. When his visitor replied that he was traveling and could not take all his furniture with him, the Chofetz Chaim explained that he was also just passing through this world and did not want to load himself up either, as that might make his journey more difficult. 

TALMIDEI CHACHOMIM

      “The desert will rejoice…” (Yeshayahu 35). What is the reason for this simcha? The Medrash on Parshas Masei explains that in the future, Midbar Sinai will be rewarded for hosting all of the Jewish people during their time in the desert.

      The Medrash then takes this idea one step further: If the desert was rewarded so grandly for its involvement with the Jewish people, then a person who hosts a talmid chochom in his home will receive even greater compensation. We cannot even fathom the reward for this.

      Why is hosting a talmid chochom such a great act? Having a great Torah scholar in one's home elevates his entire residence. Hashem views it differently because of the talmid chochom who is residing there.

      The places in the midbar where Klal Yisroel stayed were written in the Torah and thus publicized and recorded for all of eternity. So, too, someone who hosts a talmid chochom in his home turns it into an achsanya shel Torah, an encampment of Torah where the Shechinah dwells. His residence gains universal acclaim and he will merit to see the fruits of his actions for all of eternity.

* * * * *

      Rabbi Travis is a rosh kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim, and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy - A Daily Tefilla Companion," a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Shternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parsha, compiled and edited by Rabbi Travis, are now available as a sefer titled “A Voice in the Darkness.” For more information about his work, contact dytravis@actcom.com. 

TEASER 

Every moment of their lives is channeled to reaching higher and higher levels of spiritual perfection.

Reconciling Opposites

Parah Adumah Helps Us Understand the Current Situation in Eretz Yisroel

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

      * * * * *

UTILIZING ARROGANCE

      Parah adumah is the chok of the Torah, for it simultaneously purifies the impure and makes the pure impure. While even Shlomo Hamelech could not fathom the full depths of this seemingly contradictory functioning, this mitzvah alludes to very deep concepts that even we can appreciate.

      In the application of the parah adumah, we find more opposites. The parah was first burned and mixed with water, and then applied with the branches of a cedar tree (erez), hyssop (ezov), and scarlet (tolas). The cedar tree is the tallest of all plants and hints to the attribute of gaavah, haughtiness, while hyssop and scarlet are from the smallest of shrubs and are reminiscent of anavah, humility.

      Arrogance is extremely harmful, and is generally considered to be one of the worst middos. However, in certain situations, there is a place for it, and it can be harnessed for the good. If used properly, it can help elevate a person to the highest levels.

      When a person starts learning Torah, there is a massive amount of knowledge in front of him, but he knows almost nothing. Looking objectively at his own talents versus the challenges that lie ahead of him could cause him to drop the whole endeavor and give up. At this point, a person is allowed to feel a certain amount of haughtiness, for this can act as an impetus to push him to become a gadol baTorah.

      Once a person has acquired a certain amount of Torah knowledge and recognizes what it means to be a talmid chochom, he should try to reverse his feelings. At this point, he should work on humility and recognize how miniscule he is vis-à-vis his Creator and the rest of the Torah that lies in front of him. This attitude will give him more siyata diShmaya and help him achieve much higher levels of Torah understanding.

      Using the above concepts, the Baal Shem Tov explained what is hinted to in the seemingly contradictory nature of parah adumah. Arrogance has the power to purify the impure at the beginning of their endeavor to become a talmid chochom. Overestimating one's abilities will save a person from the feeling of despair that he will never achieve anything.

      However, once a person has reached a level of understanding regarding what Torah is really meant to be - once he has attained some purity - then haughtiness becomes a dangerous attribute. At this point, the very same attribute that he initially used to elevate himself in his Torah learning - to purify the impure - can now cause him to become impure and to plummet to the lowest depths. He should try to swing to the opposite extreme and work on humility.

DANGER OR PROTECTION

      We can understand the seemingly contradictory nature of the parah adumah in another light. Chazal reveal that Torah can be a sam hachaim, an elixir of life, or a sam hamovess, a deadly poison. When a person recognizes that Torah is the word of Hashem, and he uses his learning to bring himself closer to his Creator, then Torah has life-giving qualities. Even someone who is currently considered impure, as a result of transgressions, can be elevated to the highest level.

      However, if a person learns Torah as he would any other wisdom, Torah becomes extremely dangerous. A person can use his knowledge to embarrass others and transgress in various ways. Even a tzaddik can become impure as a result of learning Torah with corrupt intentions.

      Based on this, we can understand another difficult parsha of the Torah. Chazal tell us that when Yisro offered Moshe Rabbeinu the chance to marry his daughter Tziporah, he made a stipulation that their first child should become a priest to idol worship. After Yisro gave up a life of idolatry, how could he request that his grandchildren follow the same path that he abandoned?

      Yisro recognized the danger of learning Torah for the wrong reasons. He felt that one should first try and grasp the futility of all other paths. Once a person comes to the understanding that all other ways are wrong and that Torah is the way to properly live one's life, then he could embark on learning Torah with the correct attitude without running the risk of it being a sam hamovess.

      Although Yisro was correct in his perception of learning Torah for the right reasons, his methodology was mistaken. First, a person must internalize “ain k'Elokeinu” - that there is no other power in the world aside from the Almighty - and only then can he grasp “mi k'Elokeinu,” the deeper understanding of His existence. A person who starts off his search for truth by trying to negate all of the mistaken ideologies that exist in the world might be drawn after them in the process and wind up actually more distanced from Torah.

DIFFICULT QUESTIONS

      People who follow Yisro's ideology and have not completely internalized “ein k'Elokeinu” might ask, “Where was the Almighty during the Holocaust? How could He stand by silently during the slaughter of millions of Jews, including women, children and cripples?” These and other similar questions plague them and do not allow them to achieve complete emunah.

      “His [the Almighty's] thoughts are not ours.” His thoughts are not on the same plane as ours, and we cannot hope to fathom the depth of His intentions. We must realize that just as we cannot comprehend the parah adumah, we cannot achieve a complete understanding of  Hashem's ways in this world.

      The Chofetz Chaim compares this to an out-of-town guest who comes to shul for Shabbos. He sees aliyos being handed out, and at first glance, he thinks it is random and concludes that there is no reasoning behind this allotment. Why is a simple person receiving an aliyah, while an esteemed rov is not honored?

      The Chofetz Chaim explains that the confused guest does not realize the broader spectrum of what is going on in that shul. Next week, the rov is making a bar mitzvah for his son and will receive an aliyah then. The simple person has not been called up to the Torah in the past six months and is therefore getting an aliyah this Shabbos.

      So, too, explains the Chofetz Chaim, we are not in touch with the full gamut of what is taking place in this world. We see life through our narrow perspective, but in truth, the picture is much broader. Only by accustoming ourselves to recognize the limitation of our vision can we hope to come to terms with life as we see it.

ERETZ YISROEL

      In our days, we must also reconcile opposites and deal with difficult questions of emunah. Jews come to Eretz Yisrael to seek out a life of kedushah vetaharah, and to try to give their children the best possible chinuch of how a Jew should live his life. They are willing to live simply in order to be able to serve Hashem in His home.

      In the midst of this mesirus nefesh, they find that they are thwarted by the secular government in achieving their goals. Last week, forty-three parents from Moshav Emmanuel were thrown in jail because they desired a higher level of chinuch for their children. The secular court system justified this verdict, claiming that halacha and the words of gedolei Torah must bow in the face of their ruling.

      In another incident, Rav Sternbuch was violently attacked by police officers who shot gas directly in the rov's face. The rov could not see for ten minutes and needed medical attention even afterward, but, bechasdei Hashem, no lasting damage was caused. How can we understand why in Eretz Yisroel, in the palace of the King, such atrocities take place?

      Rav Mordechai Pogromansky said that right before the coming of Moshiach, the final nisyonos will be regarding Eretz Yisroel. The Almighty will test whether the Jews living there are completely given over to His will. Those who successfully overcome these challenges and are faithful to Him will merit redemption.

      Hashem's eyes are not on those misguided individuals who are imposing these restrictions. Rather, His eyes are focused on how we will strengthen ourselves under this persecution and use these incidents to solidify our emunah.. May we see the implementation of the true Torah leadership in Eretz Yisroel quickly.

      * * * * *

      Rabbi Travis is a rosh kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim, and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy - A Daily Tefilla Companion," a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Shternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parsha, compiled and edited by Rabbi Travis, are now available as a sefer titled “A Voice in the Darkness.” For more information about his work, contact dytravis@actcom.com.

TEASER

The secular court system justified this verdict, claiming that halacha and the words of gedolei Torah must bow in the face of their ruling.
 

Korach as the Prototype of Machlokes Shelo L'Sheim Shomayim

 

By Rav Moshe Sternbuch 

      The following was written by Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Travis based on a drasha given by Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rosh Av Beis Din of the Eidah Hachareidis of Yerushalayim.

      * * * * *

PORTRAYING GOOD INTENTIONS

      The Mishnah in Pirkei Avos lists the dispute of Korach and Moshe Rabbeinu as the classic example of a machlokes that is not l'sheim Shomayim. At first glance, nothing could seem farther from the truth. Korach came with eloquent claims that every member of the Jewish people is holy, and outwardly appeared extremely l'sheim Shomayim.

      Herein lies the deeper meaning of the Mishnah. Although Korach was motivated by a desire for honor, he portrayed sincere and pure intentions. Because Korach looked like he was acting l'shem Shomayim, his argument was more convincing than those of most resha'im, and this made him far more dangerous than others.

      Korach argued that the entire congregation is holy and Hashem is betocham, amongst them. “Betocham” implied that every Jew's heart was imbued with the Divine spirit and this elevated every Jew to the highest level. In light of the great kedushah that every Jew had, they did not need Moshe Rabbeinu to be the leader of Klal Yisroel.

      In more recent history, we find that the renowned Zionist Theodore Herzl used similar tactics. Herzl was a masterful speaker, and although his true agenda was to abolish any trace of Torah from the Jewish people, in his speeches he would stress the need to return to Eretz Yisroel. By latching on to such a holy concept as returning to Israel, Herzl made himself appear as if he were truly interested solely in the welfare and the strengthening of the Jewish community.

      Many prominent rabbonim were taken in by Herzl's persuasive speeches and felt that, under his leadership, salvation was possible. Rav Chaim Brisker, however, stood up against him and revealed that his great sincerity was actually the greatest danger that the Jewish people of that time faced. People would flock after his idealism only to find themselves pulled away from Torah.

      After the formation of the state of Israel, Herzl's true ideologies were revealed. It was clear that the primary motivating factor behind setting up the state was to eliminate Torah Judaism from Klal Yisroel. The Brisker Rov commented, “It took people seventy years to understand what my father meant.”

THE DANGER OF KEEPING QUIET

      Although Korach died still holding on to his erroneous ideologies, his children repented right before their death sentence was Divinely administered. They were not held responsible for their father's actions, and their teshuvah was accepted. Chazal tell us that until this day, they have a special corner in Gehennom where they sing, “Moshe Emes VeToraso Emes.”

      Seemingly, the teshuvah that Korach's children did right before they died should have been sufficient for them to merit Gan Eden. If they sincerely repented, why did they have to go to Gehennom? What is the deeper meaning of their singing shirah in the midst of Gehennom?

      In truth, Korach's children recognized the false nature of their father's arguments much earlier. They should have protested their father's actions before he was swallowed up into the earth. Because they remained quiet and did not take action against their father's insidious deeds, they could not be included in the reward of the rest of the Jewish people in Gan Eden.

      Right before they were swallowed into the earth, Korach's children were able to act on their recognition of their father's ways. Since they did teshuvah right before they died, they were not included in the harsh punishment of Korach and the rest of their followers. Instead, they received a middle ground, existing in Gehennom but singing the praises of the Torah.

JUST LIKE AMALEIK

      How far-reaching was Korach's evil nature? The Ba'al HaTurim reveals that Korach's ideology was similar to that of Amaleik. The initial comparison seems difficult to comprehend, as the Torah considers Amaleik evil incarnate.

      Amaleik's evil was not limited to their transgressions, but was inherent in their very nature. They all saw the miracles that Hashem performed, and yet they still planned a rebellion against the Almighty. Their readiness to battle G-d after seeing His strength displayed their extreme chutzpah, sheer brazenness, in the face of witnessing truth.

      Korach took part and witnessed all of the miracles that Hashem did for the Jewish people when leaving Mitzrayim. This did not deter him from going ahead with his rebellion against Moshe Rabbeinu, who was personally appointed by the Almighty to lead the Jewish people. Korach's actions also showed great chutzpah, and therefore his actions can legitimately be compared to those of Amaleik.

INNER BEAUTY

      After the incident of Korach, we find that, once again, the leadership of the Jewish people was challenged when part of Klal Yisroel complained and instigated the argument of whether Aharon was really worthy to direct the Jewish people. Aharon was a complete tzaddik who went quietly in the ways of Hashem and did not have the flamboyance of Korach.

      Hashem commanded to take the staffs of each of the roshei shevatim, including that of Aharon to represent Levi, and to write each leader's name on his staff. Then, the staff of the individual who was fitting to lead the Jewish people would sprout flowers. What was it about this act that proved Aharon was, in fact, worthy to guide Klal Yisroel?

      While Aharon might not have shared Korach's charisma - a quality that many people deem essential to good leadership - he was a complete tzaddik, which is, objectively, far more important. The proof of his righteousness was in his actions, which were the external manifestation of his exalted level. Hashem showed and attested to Aharon's inner beauty when He caused his staff to sprout elegant flowers.

      Hashem demonstrated that even though Aharon was quiet in his ways, this did not inhibit what he was able to accomplish. The fruit and flowers that sprouted from his staff showed just the opposite - the quiet tzaddik who does not expend himself on boisterous statements and behavior can save his energy for mitzvos.

      The Vilna Gaon writes that in the final generations before Moshiach, the leaders of the Jewish people will be from the eirev rav. In today's world, where sheker is rampant, we must be ever so careful of Jewish leaders who act flamboyantly, but whose actions are motivated by wrong intentions. Hashem should protect us from such charlatans, and help us to recognize who the true gedolim of the Jewish people are. 

      * * * * *

      Rabbi Travis is a rosh kollel of Kollel Toras Chaim in Yerushalayim, and is the author of Shaylos U'Teshuvos Toras Chaim and "Praying With Joy - A Daily Tefilla Companion," a practical daily guide to improving one's prayers, available from Feldheim Publishers. Rav Shternbuch's weekly shiurim on the parsha, compiled and edited by Rabbi Travis, are now available as a sefer titled “A Voice in the Darkness.” For more information about his work, contact dytravis@actcom.com. 

The Anisakis – A Boring Bug

The  Life of a Bug

  Recently a tiny worm called the Anisakis has made the headlines in the Jewish world. Although this bug lives a relatively placid and boring life, his claim to fame is his infestation of salmon and other fish. Let us try to understand what this controversy is about, and how his presence affects the halachic status of the fish it appears in.

  The Gemara in Chulin 67b writes that bugs found in the stomach of animals and fish are forbidden. If these insects are found in the flesh of an animal, they are considered to be a part of its meat. Since they have taken residence and grown inside the meat, they are considered to be an actual part of the flesh of the animal.

   In such circumstances their status differs depending if they are found in meat or fish. Meat requires shechita to permit it, and this shechita does not help permit the bugs. Therefore one can not eat the meat without first removing the bugs.

  However fish do not require shechita or any other process to render them permitted. Since these bugs are considered part of the actual flesh of the animal, they take on the same halachic status as the flesh of the fish. Therefore the Gemara, Rishonim and the Shulchan Aruch 84,16 rule that bugs found in the meat flesh of fish are mutar to eat.

  Thus these fish worms present us with a fascinating halachic situation. While Jews generally cringe at the site of a bug or worm in our food, the insects found in the flesh of the fish are 100% glatt kosher. The Gemara says that Revina, the coauthor of Shas, would eat them but ask his mother to cover up the bugs in the fish so he would not have to look at these revolting creatures while eating his food.

  Based on the above parameters, we seemingly have clear guidelines to deal with any shayla. If the bug is found in the stomach of the fish it cannot eaten, and if it is discovered in the flesh it is permitted. Wherein lies the difficulty?

  In steps the Anisakis worm. According to the research and observations of scientists and others, this bug originates in the stomach of the fish and bores its way into the flesh of its carrier. Boring its way from one place to another creates complicated circumstances for the concerned Jewish fish consumer as whether he can eat this fish without first removing the worms. 

  Since the bug was originally found in the stomach, seemingly it should be categorized as a stomach bug and be forbidden. However after it bores its way from the innards to the flesh, perhaps we should judge its status as a flesh worm and permit it. Let us try and get some clarity regarding this question which is on the table of the greatest halachic authorities of our time. 

Humble Beginnings

  There are a number of practical and halachic grey areas regarding the Anisakis worm. Each one presents us with a new difficulty in classifying its halachic status. In order to understand these points, we will try and trace the life cycle of this bug.

  The Torah categorizes insects as sheratzim, animals which crawl. Some crawl on the ground, others in the water, and others in the air. Any insects which did not exist in one of these domains can not be forbidden.

  Thus we find the poskim discuss bugs which originate in cheese are permitted to eat. These insects originate and remain in the cheese for the duration of their existence. Since they never crawled out of the cheese they can be eaten together with the cheese.

  Some Anisakis worms start as larva on the bottom of the marine floor, at times tens of thousands of feet under sea level. At this stage of their existence some of them are eaten by crill, small non kosher sea creatures, which are consequently eaten by salmon and other fish. If at this point in time they are microscopic they are a halachic non entity and permitted.

  After these bugs are consumed by salmon and other larger fish, their status should depend on their size. If the worms remain microscopic, they would not become forbidden. However if the grow to a visible size, they should be included in the Gemara’s prohibition against eating bugs found in the stomach.

     Researchers say that while in the stomach of the salmon the worms bore their way into the flesh of the carrier fish. This migration from the stomach to the flesh brings us to the main point of dispute. How will we now classify these worms? 

Points of Doubt

     In any halachic question, the points of doubt involved always make coming out with a clear conclusion difficult. While most questions involve some level of doubt, the amount of unclear points regarding this issue makes coming out with a clear psak a formidable task. We will try to list some of them in order that we can fathom the depth of the arguments of the Gedolim who are discussing these points.

     Some larve of the worm originate on the ocean floor. If at that point they are visible entities they take on the status of sheretz hayam and are forbidden. On the other hand, if they are not visible to the naked eye then they are considered a halachic non-entity and are permitted.

     This doubt continues after the larve are swallowed by the crill. If at that point the Anisakis worm would be visible if it was outside the fish then it may become a sheretz hayam and is forbidden. However it is not clear if a worm which became visible inside of a fish does indeed get a status of issur.

     Even the worms found on the inside of the fish, are not definitely forbidden. The Pri Megadim (Sifsei Da’as 84,43) rules that this is only a safek if these worms originated from outside the fish. However like any Torah issue, even in a case of doubt we are forbidden to eat these worms. 

Worm or Fish

      The Gemara writes that worms found in the flesh of animals are forbidden since the animal meat requires shechita to permit it. At first glance the words of the Gemara are baffling. Why should we think that shechita make a worm permitted?

      Rashi explains that once the bugs become part of the flesh of the animal, they take on the halachic status of the animal and the Shach (84,42) rules like this. Therefore in the case of worms found in the meat of a cow, these worms become meat, and technically require shechita to permit them. Since shechita does not help to permit worms, they remain with the issur of aver min hachai.

      The Chazon Ish (Yoreh Deah 14,13) takes a different approach. He argues that even after these worms have lodged themselves into the meat, since the meat of an animal is not considered food, the worms retain their prohibited status. Fish on the other hand, do not require shechita, and the bugs found retain the food status and do not get an issur of sheretz hamayim.

     According to the Chazon Ish who rules that these bugs retain their status of worm while embedded in the animal because it is not considered food, we may be able to apply this halacha to our case. If the worms become a recognizable entity inside the body of their carrier fish, since they are not considered to be food, they could get a worm status.

     Even according to understanding that the bugs are forbidden because of aver min hachai, these worms may still be forbidden. The reason that they are considered aver min hachai is because they become part of the actual meat. Some poskim say that becoming part of a non kosher fish may give the worms the status of the non-kosher fish (Minchas Chinuch 163). 

 Interpreting Silence

      One of the strongest arguments of those who wish to permit these worms is that the Gemara does not discuss the case of migrating worms. If the halacha is that these worms are forbidden then someone should mention this. Rav Belsky amd Rav Falk understand this is a clear proof that the bugs are permitted.

      Rav Belsky argues that from the stimas of the Shulchan Aruh it must be that these bugs are permitted. It is unlikely that thee was such a major change in metzios, and therefore he concludes that the Aniskais worms that we have today are te same worms that existed in the times of Chazal, and that there is no reason to forbid them.

      Rav Falk agrees with the general principle that the Shulchan Aruch would permit these bugs, and adds lundus to the heter. Rav Falk aargues that any bug which became visible only inside the fish never becomes assur, and cites scientists. The reason for this is just as the sides of the bucket is ribisei, so too inside the fish is certainly rebisei. Since the bug spends its whole existence as reviseh of a sheretz hamayim, there is no time when an issur is chal on it.

      Rav Falk adds that there is  clear distinction between sheretz hayama and sheretz ha’aretz. Sheretz ha’artez is forbidden as soon as it becomes separated from the fruit. Therefore if the fruit is in a basket it becomes assur as soon as it comes out of the fruit. However if the bug comes out of the water, it remains permitted as long as it is still in the sides of the bucket or the well. The reason for this is the sheretz hayam only becomes forbidden after it has completely separated itself from the water, and as long as the bug is in the side of the bucket or the well it is rebisei and mutar.

      Furthermore the Ravyah says that anything that a sheretz hamayim cannot become a sheretz ha’aretz afterwards. The Rema relies on this shita if the bug gets mixed up with food afterwards. In this case the Ravyah would argue there is never a shem issur on this bug.

      If these bugs are mutar, why are the bugs found in the stomach assur. Rav Falk argues that this is a chumrah of Chazal, lest the fish swallow a bug that is forbidden. However these Anasakis worms which are definitely not swallowed seen and never get a halachah of shertez ha’aretz, are definitely permitted, ad there is no room for a safek.

      Rav Wosner (Shevet HaLevi 4,83) in a teshuva written a number of years ago describes an almost identical situation regarding worms that were swallowed up by shrimp.  

      Rav Wosner writes that the scientists definitely can not be trusted to relay the facts correctly. If the metzious however is how they describe, then the fish should be forbidden.

      In the teshuva Rav Wosner brings an opinion that since the worms were swallowed by a fish as larve, perhaps there is no issur. He latter disputes this point in the continuation of h teshuva.   

More S’feikos 

     The Gemara makes an open ended statement that worms found in the fish’s stomach are forbidden and in the meat are permitted. It does not discuss the question of worms which started inside the stomach and traveled into the flesh of the fish. If these worms were at some point visible will we treat them as forbidden as stomach worms or as permitted as flesh worms?

     The matirim that these should now be treated as worms found in the flesh. Even though the Ran and other Rishonim explain that these worms are permitted because they grew in the flesh, these worms also grew somewhat in the flesh of the fish. This would render them permitted.

     There is a major question to be asked on this understanding. If in fact these worms were previously forbidden in the stomach of the fish, how can these worms now make a 180 turn and now become permitted? Once their halachic status is set, it cannot change.

     We add to the difficulty of determining the status of these fish with the following three questions about the life cycle of the Anisakis bug: First, are they in fact swallowed microscopic by the crill, or perhaps they are already visible and prohibited as sheretz hamayim? This issue is extremely difficult to determine as they are consumed very deep on the sea floor.

     Second, even if they were eaten microscopic, do they remain microscopic when they are eaten by the crill? Researchers say that they have found visible Anisakis worms inside the crill. If so they may become forbidden at that point.

     Third, even if they are halachicaly invisible inside the crill, what is their status inside the stomach of the salmon? If at that point they are visible then they would have the status of a sheretz hamayim. When they bore into the flesh they would enter as forbidden entities.

       A further problem is that the poskim write that the bugs found between the flesh and the skin of the fish are permitted. These Anisakis bugs are found inside the flesh of the fish itself, and sometimes near the stomach. This would point to the fact that the bugs found in this fish are not the same ones that are permitted by the Gemara and the poskim.

     Some poskim write that if the worms are found in the brain or lungs that they are definitely forbidden (PriChadash 84,54, Darkei Teshuva 84, Chachmas Adam 38,28). 

Bitul Issur Lechatchila

Even if these bugs are forbidden, perhaps they are batel since they cannot be openly seen in the fish. There are a number of issues to deal with.  

Hukar isura tells us that if the issur is nikar then it has to be removed. Here the issur may not nikar to the naked eye, but under blue light or even fluorescent light the can be seen.  

Taz 104,1 (end) says that by yavesh b’yavesh the issur changes to heter and becomes heter. However if the issur is yavesh b’lach and a person could remove it, the worms remain issur. What about if one cannot remove the worms? 

The Taz cites the Rambam that as long as the issur is not mixed in with the heter it is not batel, and therefore the whey of issur of cheese is not batel. According to this the worms would be a problem. The Rashba holds that even if it is nikar, if you can’t remove the issur it is batel. Since you can remove these bugs the fish should be a problem. 

Can a person cook the salmon thus making it impossible to find the salmon? The Shulchan Aruch 84,13 says a person can cook honey in order to liquefy the honey in order to remove the legs even though taam will go into the honey.  

However the Taz only permits this if there is no other way to rectify the issur. Here on can remove the bugs beforehand so it wouldn't be permitted to be mevatel them, and if it is impossible to remove them it would be mutar.

However all of this applies to v’dai issur. The Shach 114,21 writes that if there is only safek issur then one can prepare the food in a way which will be meatel the issur. The Pri Megadim in Sifei Daas 99,7 argues on the Shach but in Mishavetzos Zehav 99,7 he writes that if it is a tircha to remove the issur and there is no way to eat it b’heter, then it is mutar to be mevatel it. Furthermore this is a safek doraisa and maybe one can only be makil when there is a safek in the metziuous and not a safek in din.  

Here in the case of the fish you have all of these sibos. The issur isn’t immediately nikar, plus it is safek, and plus it is a tircha to remove it. Seemingly this would be a reason to be matir the fish. 

However all of these Achronim are only matir if the situation already existed, e.g. his wheat was infested or his honey had ants in it. Also the bugs are a beriah and perhaps they are not batel.  

Do the bugs survive the cooking? The author heard from a rav who used to be a professional cook that if the fish was cooked for a while them the worms would probably not remain intact. However if the fish was fried or baked (which is usually the case), the worms would probably survive frying or roasting.  

Safek S’feikos

      There is a famous principle in halacha, that a safek s’feika is permitted. The basic premise of this concept is that even when one has to be stringent regarding a case of doubt, when it comes to a doubt which itself is a doubt, the result is not prohibited. In a number of areas of halacha the concept of safek s’feika is utilized to provide  lenient ruling.

     As we have noted, the issue of the Anisakis worms in fish contains some many doubts. Perhaps we can combine these doubts to produce a safek s’feika. On closer introspection, this is not a viable option for a number of resons.

      There are numerous conditions required to have a safek s’feika, and the Shach in his treatise on safek s’feika concludes that this topic is so difficult that one should not utilize any safek s’feika unless it is explicitly mentioned by the Gemara or early poskim. Others argue on this ruling and do make use of safek s’feika. In general we follow the Shach, barring exceptional circumstances when we will use a safek s’feika to rule leniently.

     One of the conditions for formulating a safek s’feika is that each of the doubts must differ from its counter doubt. In this case, although there are numerous doubts, they essentially boil down to a single question: Is this Anisakis worm a sheretz hayam which is forbidden or does it have some other status which is permitted? This would invaildate it from being considered a safek s’feika

 

Conclusion

     Because of all of the technical and halachic questions involved in understanding the Anisakis worm, the poskim of Eretz Yisrael have currently ruled that until these issues are clarified, fish containing the Anazsis worm have the status of safek issur Torah. If these factors can be significantly clarified perhaps this ruling will change. But at the current time the issues is far from clear at this stage.

     While the Anisakis leads a relatively boring life, this little worm has shaken up the entire Jewish world. He has presented us with a set of circumstances which forces us to dig deeper, and try to understand what Chazal meant. May Hashem give us the siyata dismaya to get a better understanding of these halachos.